@article {Fichtinger2008b,
	title = {Robotic assistance for ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy},
	journal = {Medical Image Analysis},
	volume = {12},
	number = {5},
	year = {2008},
	month = {06/2008},
	pages = {535},
	publisher = {Queen{\textquoteright}s University; 25 Union Street;725 Goodwin Hall; Kingston; ON; Canada gabor@cs queensu ca},
	abstract = {<p>We present a robotically assisted prostate brachytherapy system, test results in training phantoms, Phase-I clinical trials The system consists of a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), a spatially co-registered robot,fully integrated with an FDA-approved commercial treatment planning system The salient feature of the system is a small parallel robot affixed to the mounting posts of the template The robot replaces the template interchangeably,using the same coordinate system Established clinical hardware,workflow, calibration remain intact In all phantom experiments,we recorded the first insertion attempt without adjustment All clinically relevant locations in the prostate were reached Non-parallel needle trajectories were achieved The pre-insertion transverse, rotational errors (measured with a Polaris optical tracker relative to the template{\textquoteright}s coordinate frame) were 0 25 mm (STD=0 17 mm), 0 75 degrees (STD=0 37 degrees) In phantoms,needle tip placement errors measured in TRUS were 1 04 mm (STD=0 50mm) A Phase-I clinical feasibility, safety trial has been successfully completed with the system We encountered needle tip positioning errors of a magnitude greater than 4mm in only 2 of 179 robotically guided needles,in contrast to manual template guidance where errors of this magnitude are much more common Further clinical trials are necessary to determine whether the apparent benefits of the robotic assistant will lead to improvements in clinical efficacy, outcomes</p>
},
	keywords = {Brachytherapy, Computer-Assisted, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Humans, instrumentation, instrumentation/methods, Interventional, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiotherapy, radiotherapy/ultrasonography, Robotics, Ultrasonography},
	doi = {10 1016/j media 2008 06 002},
	url = {http://dx doi org/10 1016/j media 2008 06 002},
	author = {Gabor Fichtinger and Jonathan Fiene and Christopher Kennedy and Gernot Kronreif and Iulian Iordachita and Danny Y Song and E. Clif Burdette and Peter Kazanzides}
}
@article {Fichtinger2005,
	title = {Image overlay for CT-guided needle insertions},
	journal = {Journal of Computer Aided Surgery},
	volume = {10},
	number = {4},
	year = {2005},
	month = {Jul},
	pages = {241{\textendash}255},
	abstract = {<p>OBJECTIVE: We present a 2D image overlay device to assist needle placement on computed tomography (CT) scanners MATERIALS AND METHODS: The system consists of a flat display, a semitransparent mirror mounted on the gantry When the physician looks at the patient through the mirror, the CT image appears to be floating inside the body with correct size, position as if the physician had 2D {\textquoteright}X-ray vision{\textquoteright} The physician draws the optimal path on the CT image The composite image is rendered on the display, thus reflected in the mirror The reflected image is used to guide the physician in the procedure In this article, we describe the design, various embodiments of the 2D image overlay system, followed by the results of phantom, cadaver experiments in multiple clinical applications RESULTS: Multiple skeletal targets were successfully accessed with one insertion attempt Generally, successful access was recorded on liver targets when a clear path opened, but the number of attempts, accuracy showed variability because of occasional lack of access Soft tissue deformation further reduced the accuracy, consistency in comparison to skeletal targets CONCLUSION: The system demonstrated strong potential for reducing faulty needle insertion attempts, thereby reducing X-ray dose, patient discomfort</p>
},
	keywords = {Animals, Biopsy, Cadaver, Calibration, Computer-Assisted, Equipment Design, Humans, Image Processing, Imaging, instrumentation, Interventional, Needle, Phantoms, Radiography, Swine, Tomography, User-Computer Interface, X-Ray Computed},
	doi = {10 1080/10929080500230486},
	url = {http://dx doi org/10 1080/10929080500230486},
	author = {Gabor Fichtinger and Anton Degeut and Gregory Fischer and Iulian Iordachita and Emese Balogh and Ken Masamune and Russell H. Taylor and Laura Fayad and Michelle de Oliveira and James Zinreich}
}
