@article {Singh2007b,
	title = {Simultaneous integrated boost of biopsy proven and MRI defined dominant intra-prostatic lesions to 95 Gray with IMRT: early results of a phase I NCI study},
	journal = {Radiation Oncology},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {36},
	publisher = {Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, USA singhanu@yahoo com},
	abstract = {<p>BACKGROUND: To assess the feasibility, early toxicity of selective, IMRT-based dose escalation (simultaneous integrated boost) to biopsy proven dominant intra-prostatic lesions visible on MRI METHODS: Patients with localized prostate cancer, an abnormality within the prostate on endorectal coil MRI were eligible All patients underwent a MRI-guided transrectal biopsy at the location of the MRI abnormality Gold fiducial markers were also placed Several days later patients underwent another MRI scan for fusion with the treatment planning CT scan This fused MRI scan was used to delineate the region of the biopsy proven intra-prostatic lesion A 3 mm expansion was performed on the intra-prostatic lesions, defined as a separate volume within the prostate The lesion + 3 mm, the remainder of the prostate + 7 mm received 94 5/75 6 Gray (Gy) respectively in 42 fractions Daily seed position was verified to be within 3 mm RESULTS: Three patients were treated Follow-up was 18, 6, and 3 months respectively Two patients had a single intra-prostatic lesion One patient had 2 intra-prostatic lesions All four intra-prostatic lesions, with margin, were successfully targeted, treated to 94 5 Gy Two patients experienced acute RTOG grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity One had grade 1 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity All symptoms completely resolved by 3 months One patient had no acute toxicity CONCLUSION: These early results demonstrate the feasibility of using IMRT for simultaneous integrated boost to biopsy proven dominant intra-prostatic lesions visible on MRI The treatment was well tolerated</p>
},
	keywords = {adverse effects/methods, Biopsy, epidemiology, epidemiology/radiotherapy, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intensity-Modulated, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, National Cancer Institute (U S ), Patient Selection, Prostatic Neoplasms, Questionnaires, Radiotherapy, Radiotherapy Dosage, United States},
	doi = {10 1186/1748-717X-2-36},
	url = {http://dx doi org/10 1186/1748-717X-2-36},
	author = {Anurag K. Singh and Peter Guion and Nancy Sears-Crouse and Karen Ullman and Sharon Smith and Paul Albert and Gabor Fichtinger and Peter Choyke and Sheng Xu and Jochen Kruecker and Bradford Wood and Axel Krieger and Holly Ning}
}
@article {Cleary2005,
	title = {Precision placement of instruments for minimally invasive procedures using a "needle driver" robot},
	journal = {international journal of medical robotics computer assisted surgery MRCAS},
	volume = {1},
	number = {2},
	year = {2005},
	month = {Jan},
	pages = {40{\textendash}47},
	abstract = {<p>Medical practice continues to move toward less invasive procedures Many of these procedures require the precision placement of a needle in the anatomy Over the past several years, our research team has been investigating the use of a robotic needle driver to assist the physician in this task This paper summarizes our work in this area The robotic system is briefly described, followed by a description of a clinical trial in spinal nerve blockade The robot was used under joystick control to place a 22 gauge needle in the spines of 10 patients using fluoroscopic imaging The results were equivalent to the current manual procedure We next describe our follow-up clinical application in lung biopsy for lung cancer screening under CT fluoroscopy The system concept is discussed, the results of a phantom study are presented A start-up company named ImageGuide has recently been formed to commercialize the robot Their revised robot design is presented, along with plans to install a ceiling-mounted version of the robot in the CT fluoroscopy suite at Georgetown University</p>
},
	keywords = {Biopsy, Cadaver, Equipment Design, Fluoroscopy, Humans, Imaging, instrumentation, instrumentation/methods, Lung, Lung Neoplasms, methods, Minimally Invasive, Needles, Nerve Block, pathology, pathology/radiography, Phantoms, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Robotics, Spinal Nerves, Surgical Procedures, Tomography, X-Ray Computed},
	doi = {10 1002/rcs 40},
	url = {http://dx doi org/10 1002/rcs 40},
	author = {Kevin Cleary and Vance Watson and David Lindisch and Russell H. Taylor and Gabor Fichtinger and Sheng Xu and Charles White and John Donlon and Michael Taylor and Alexandru Patriciu and Dumitru Mazilu and Dan Stoianovici}
}
