@article {Jain2007,
	title = {Intra-operative 3D guidance in prostate brachytherapy using a non-isocentric C-arm},
	journal = {Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI)},
	volume = {10},
	number = {Pt 2},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {9{\textendash}17},
	publisher = {Johns Hopkins University, USA},
	abstract = {<p>Intra-operative guidance in Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate brachytherapy requires localization of inserted radioactive seeds relative to the prostate Seeds were reconstructed using a typical C-arm, and exported to a commercial brachytherapy system for dosimetry analysis Technical obstacles for 3D reconstruction on a non-isocentric C-arm included pose-dependent C-arm calibration; distortion correction; pose estimation of C-arm images; seed reconstruction;, C-arm to TRUS registration In precision-machined hard phantoms with 40-100 seeds, we correctly reconstructed 99 8\% seeds with a mean 3D accuracy of 0 68 mm In soft tissue phantoms with 45-87 seeds, clinically realistic 15 degrees C-arm motion, we correctly reconstructed 100\% seeds with an accuracy of 1 3 mm The reconstructed 3D seed positions were then registered to the prostate segmented from TRUS In a Phase-1 clinical trial, so far on 4 patients with 66-84 seeds, we achieved intra-operative monitoring of seed distribution, dosimetry We optimized the 100\% prescribed iso-dose contour by inserting an average of 3 75 additional seeds, making intra-operative dosimetry possible on a typical C-arm, at negligible additional cost to the existing clinical installation</p>
},
	keywords = {Algorithms, Brachytherapy, Computer-Assisted, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Humans, Imaging, instrumentation/methods, Interventional, Intraoperative Care, Male, methods, Prostatic Neoplasms, Prosthesis Implantation, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Radiography, radiography/radiotherapy, Radiotherapy, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity, Specificity, Three-Dimensional, Tomography, X-Ray Computed},
	author = {Ameet K. Jain and Anton Degeut and Iulian Iordachita and Gouthami Chintalapani and Jack Blevins and Le Yi and Elwood Armour and E. Clif Burdette and Danny Y Song and Gabor Fichtinger}
}
@article {Jain2005a,
	title = {FTRAC},
	journal = {Journal of Medical Physics},
	volume = {32},
	number = {10},
	year = {2005},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {3185{\textendash}3198},
	abstract = {<p>C-arm fluoroscopy is ubiquitous in contemporary surgery, but it lacks the ability to accurately reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) information A major obstacle in fluoroscopic reconstruction is discerning the pose of the x-ray image, in 3D space Optical/magnetic trackers tend to be prohibitively expensive, intrusive, cumbersome in many applications We present single-image-based fluoroscope tracking (FTRAC) with the use of an external radiographic fiducial consisting of a mathematically optimized set of ellipses, lines, and points This is an improvement over contemporary fiducials, which use only points The fiducial encodes six degrees of freedom in a single image by creating a unique view from any direction A nonlinear optimizer can rapidly compute the pose of the fiducial using this image The current embodiment has salient attributes: small dimensions (3 x 3 x 5 cm); need not be close to the anatomy of interest;, accurately segmentable We tested the fiducial, the pose recovery method on synthetic data, also experimentally on a precisely machined mechanical phantom Pose recovery in phantom experiments had an accuracy of 0 56 mm in translation, 0 33 degrees in orientation Object reconstruction had a mean error of 0 53 mm with 0 16 mm STD The method offers accuracies similar to commercial tracking systems, and appears to be sufficiently robust for intraoperative quantitative C-arm fluoroscopy Simulation experiments indicate that the size can be further reduced to 1 x 1 X 2 cm, with only a marginal drop in accuracy</p>
},
	keywords = {Algorithms, Computer-Assisted, Fluoroscopy, Imaging, Information Storage, instrumentation/methods, methods, Phantoms, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Reproducibility of Results, Retrieval, Sensitivity, Specificity, Three-Dimensional},
	author = {Ameet K. Jain and Tabish Mustufa and Yu Zhou and E. Clif Burdette and Gregory Chirikjian and Gabor Fichtinger}
}
