Title | FTRAC |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2005 |
Authors | Jain, A. K., Mustufa T., Zhou Y., E. Burdette C., Chirikjian G., & Fichtinger G. |
Journal | Journal of Medical Physics |
Volume | 32 |
Number | 10 |
Pagination | 3185–3198 |
Date Published | Oct |
Keywords | Algorithms, Computer-Assisted, Fluoroscopy, Imaging, Information Storage, instrumentation/methods, methods, Phantoms, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Reproducibility of Results, Retrieval, Sensitivity, Specificity, Three-Dimensional |
Abstract | C-arm fluoroscopy is ubiquitous in contemporary surgery, but it lacks the ability to accurately reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) information A major obstacle in fluoroscopic reconstruction is discerning the pose of the x-ray image, in 3D space Optical/magnetic trackers tend to be prohibitively expensive, intrusive, cumbersome in many applications We present single-image-based fluoroscope tracking (FTRAC) with the use of an external radiographic fiducial consisting of a mathematically optimized set of ellipses, lines, and points This is an improvement over contemporary fiducials, which use only points The fiducial encodes six degrees of freedom in a single image by creating a unique view from any direction A nonlinear optimizer can rapidly compute the pose of the fiducial using this image The current embodiment has salient attributes: small dimensions (3 x 3 x 5 cm); need not be close to the anatomy of interest;, accurately segmentable We tested the fiducial, the pose recovery method on synthetic data, also experimentally on a precisely machined mechanical phantom Pose recovery in phantom experiments had an accuracy of 0 56 mm in translation, 0 33 degrees in orientation Object reconstruction had a mean error of 0 53 mm with 0 16 mm STD The method offers accuracies similar to commercial tracking systems, and appears to be sufficiently robust for intraoperative quantitative C-arm fluoroscopy Simulation experiments indicate that the size can be further reduced to 1 x 1 X 2 cm, with only a marginal drop in accuracy |
PerkWeb Citation Key | Jain2005a |